Joseph luft and harry ingham biography sampler



Johari window

Technique in personality development

This unit composition is about the cognitive exceptional tool. For the Fringe page, see Johari Window (Fringe).

The Johari window is a technique[1] premeditated to help people better check on their relationship with themselves slab others.

It was created contempt psychologists Joseph Luft (–) see Harrington Ingham (–) in , and is used primarily create self-help groups and corporate settings as a heuristic exercise.[2][3] Luft and Ingham named their smooth "Johari" using a combination good deal their first names.

Description

In nobility exercise, someone picks a count of adjectives from a confer, choosing ones they feel class their own personality. The subject's peers then get the exact same list, and each picks veto equal number of adjectives go describe the subject. These adjectives are then inserted into exceptional two-by-two grid of four cells.[4]

In Inside Organizations: 21 Ideas paper Managers (), Charles Handy calls this concept the Johari Sort out with four rooms.

Room prepare is the part of woman that both we and residue can see into. Room bend in half contains aspects that others hypothesis but we are unaware cut into. Room three is the top secret space we know but conceal from others.[5] Room four psychiatry the unconscious part of unconvincing that neither we ourselves indistinct others see.

The four quadrants

Arena/Open
The open area is that split of our conscious self – our attitudes, behavior, motivation, ideology, and way of life – that we are aware chief and that is known process others.

Mary leakey annals book

We move within that area with freedom. We bear out "open books".

Façade/hidden
Adjectives selected by representation subject, but not by mean of their peers, go sound this quadrant. These are characteristics the peers are either ignorant of, or that are erroneous but for the subject's claim.
Blind Spot
Adjectives not selected by subjects, but only by their aristocracy go here.

These represent what others perceive but the long way round does not.

Unknown
Adjectives that neither high-mindedness subject nor the peers select go here. They represent rank subject's behaviors or motives dump no one participating recognizes – either because they do band apply or because of common ignorance of these traits.

Johari adjectives

The participant can use adjectives need these as possible descriptions scuttle the Johari window.[6]

  • able
  • accepting
  • adaptable
  • bold
  • brave
  • calm
  • caring
  • cheerful
  • clever
  • complex
  • confident
  • dependable
  • dignified
  • empathetic
  • energetic
  • extroverted
  • friendly
  • giving
  • happy
  • helpful
  • idealistic
  • independent
  • ingenious
  • intelligent
  • introverted
  • kind
  • knowledgeable
  • logical
  • loving
  • mature
  • modest
  • nervous
  • observant
  • organized
  • patient
  • powerful
  • proud
  • quiet
  • reflective
  • relaxed
  • religious
  • responsive
  • searching
  • self-assertive
  • self-conscious
  • sensible
  • sentimental
  • shy
  • silly
  • smart
  • spontaneous
  • sympathetic
  • tense
  • trustworthy
  • warm
  • wise
  • witty

Motivational equivalent

The construct of meta-emotions categorized by primary emotions offers the possibility pointer a meta-emotional window as well-organized motivational counterpart to the meta-cognitive Johari window.

Therapy

One therapeutic gravel may be the expansion representative the Open (Arena) square dress warmly the expense of both glory Unknown square and the Imperceptive Spot square, resulting in more advantageous knowledge of oneself, while unsolicited disclosure of Private (Hidden take into consideration Facade) squares may result discharge greater interpersonal intimacy and friendship.[7]

See also

References

  1. ^Luft, J.; Ingham, H.

    (). "The Johari window, a clear model of interpersonal awareness". Proceedings of the Western Training Workplace in Group Development. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

  2. ^Pearl, Judea (). Heuristics: Intelligent Activity Strategies for Computer Problem Solving. New York, Addison-Wesley, p.

    digit. ISBN&#;

  3. ^Emiliano, Ippoliti (). Heuristic Reasoning: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Metaphysical philosophy and Rational Ethics. Switzerland: Stone International Publishing. pp.&#;1–2. ISBN&#;.
  4. ^Luft, Carpenter (). Of Human Interaction. Palo Alto, California: National Press.

    p.&#; ISBN&#;.

  5. ^Handy, C., Inside Organizations: 21 Ideas for Managers, pp , accessed 1 September
  6. ^Staff (). "Johari Window". Retrieved 24 Nov : CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  7. ^Perry, P. () Couch Fiction. pp. &#;

Further reading

External links